Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Wittelsbach, Prinz von Bayern
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete this, Markus Wittelsbach, Prinz von Bayern, and Josepha Zapletal. Cleanup Prince Georg of Bavaria, Javornik, and Prince Leopold of Bavaria. --Deathphoenix 02:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The veracity of the assertion that George, Prinz von Bayern, had an illegitimate son named Franz cannot be verified; citations to sources were requested and have not been provided. If there were such an illegitimate son, we should be able to cite sources; if there wasn't, the article is deceptive; if there was and we can't cite sources, it's original research. (Please see conversations at Talk:Franz Wittelsbach, Prinz von Bayern) I am also nominating the following related pages because they depend on the existence of "Franz", and are similarly unsourced:
The following articles may also need editing attention if the claims cannot be documented:
- Nunh-huh 20:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete he isn't quite notable, so this amounts to a memorial. Ruby 21:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nunh-huh, who has done a lot of work here, on the grounds of being unverifiable. If this is a hoax, and something about those photographs and the indignant tone of those denials on the talk page, it's a curious hoax. There's still some small doubt in my mind, but Nunh-hh gave 'em plenty of opportunity to verify. --Lockley 22:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.